The
tribal dance house, intended for religious dances, stood on a little bay of
Grand Lake, about 3 miles northwest from the present village of Charenton. Like
all other lodges, it was about 12 feet square, with a pointed roof, but it was
surrounded with a picket fence. It contained nothing else but the garments of
the dancers and the three kinds of paints used at this ceremony: the ha’pt,
or “vermillion paint,” the ku’ps,
or “black paint,” and the kúpshesh,
or “white paint.” No idols, stuffed animals, perpetual fires, etc., were
found in connection with it, as was the case with the temple of the Natchez
people.
As
there was only one meeting place of this description among all the Shetimasha,
the participants gathered from all the surrounding lake settlements by canoes
the day before the new moon. Men, women and children flocked to the ceremony in
large numbers. The ceremony took place in honor of Kutnähänsh,
or the Noon-Day Sun, and in summer time lasted longer than at other seasons of
the year. The men danced with the breechcloth on, the body painted red, and with
feathers stuck in the ribbons encircling the head. Gourd rattles and the
scratching of alligator skins furnished the music for the occasion. They fasted
during the six days the dance lasted. When the ceremony was drawing to a close,
they drank water in order to produce vomiting; and, after they had removed in
this manner any impurities in their systems, they began to eat heartily.[i]
6-day
mid-summer festival was held annually, during which young males were initiated
into manhood.[ii]
The
Chitimacha resembled the Natchez in having a distinct class of nobility, with
different terms of etiquette for each.
There
are distinctions of rank recognized among them; the chief and their descendants
are noble, and the balance of the people are of the class of commons. An old man
of this latter class, however great may be his age, will use to the young noble,
however young he may be, respectful expressions which are only employed toward
the nobility, while the latter has the right of speaking to the former only in
popular terms. [iii]
Instead
of marrying among the common people, Chitimacha nobles were constrained to take
partners in their own class, which is tantamount to the admission that a true
caste system existed. If a Noble married among the common people, he would have
to stay with them, and for that reason many refused to marry at all when no
women of their own caste were to be had, and thus hastened the extinction of the
tribe.
Chieftanships
seem to have passed from father to son absolutely regardless of clan. There are
two cases in which wives succeeded their husbands. The wife of Soulier Rouge,
named Adell Champagne, and perhaps the daughter of the chief Champagne,
succeeded him on his death four or five years before the Civil War.
[iv]
“We
were perfectly well received by their grand chief and by all the savages of the
village: they gave us something to drink and eat such as buffalo, bear, and
deer, and every kind of fruit in abundance, such as peaches, plums, watermelons,
pumpkins, and all of an exquisite flavor. The pumpkins are indeed better than
those in France: they are cooked without water, and the juice that comes from
them is like syrup, it is so sweet. As for the watermelons, they are just about
like those in France. The peaches are better and bigger; but their plums are not
so good; there are two varieties, white ones and red ones.[v]
“They
served us also some of the sagamité, which is a kind of pap made from maize and
green beans that are like those in France. Their bread comes from maize and from
a grain that grows on canes.[vi]
“They
have some dishes made of wood and others of clay, which, even though made by the
hands of savages, are nevertheless very well made indeed. The savages' women
also make great earthen pots, designed almost like big kettles, which hold about
forty pints; in these they cook their sagamité for two or three families; this
is how they contrive among themselves to avoid the trouble of cooking the same
thing every day, each one in turn doing it . . . . An observation I have made
about the savages is that, however abundant their provisions may be, they do not
overindulge themselves, but eat only what they need, yet very untidily, most of
them eating only with their fingers, though they possess spoons, which they made
from buffalo horns.[vii]
“Their
meat is usually smoked or in some other way buccaned, as
they say in that region. They have, however, a kind of gridiron on which they
put it, but with little fire underneath, doing little more than drying it, the
smoke contributing as much to the process as the heat from the fire.”[viii]
Swanton
states: “The material culture of this tribe was similar in most respects to
that of the Indians along the lower Mississippi. It was distinguished from them
principally by the increased importance of food obtained from the waters and the
decreased importance of food from land animals.”[ix]
Gatschet
states, “The fishing in the lakes and bayous was done by the women, men, and
boys; not with nets, but only with hook and line. They fished at night just as
often as during the daytime.”[x]
Their
houses were like those of their neighbors, ie, they consisted mainly of palmetto
leaves over a framework of poles, and like them, the houses of the chiefs were
larger than those of the common people. According
to Benjamin Paul, there was a smoke hole, which could be closed when the weather
was bad.[xi]
Instead
of being left long all over, the hair was shaved off by both sexes at the sides
and in front, a single ridge remaining, extending from the middle of the top of
the head to the neck. This was tied with strips of deerskin and ornamented with
feathers.[xii]
The Shetimasha men were also known to fastened a piece of lead to the end of the
tress behind for the purpose of keeping the head erect. The women wore their
hair in plaits or tresses, ornamented with plumes. A portion of the hair was
wound in a coil about the head and secured by pins.
They
adorned themselves with much care and artistic taste, and tattooed their legs,
arms, and faces in wavy punctured lines. In painting themselves they used only
the red and white colors. They sported necklaces, finger rings, bracelets,
nose rings, and earrings.[xiii]
Fine
pieces of copper were hammered into bracelets, shoulder pieces, and breast
pieces. Others were worn about the waist, and the chief carried a piece upon his
forehead. Nothing nearer like a hat was employed. The nose ornaments were
sometimes made of gold or silver.[xiv]
The
warriors enjoyed a peculiar kind of distinction, as follows: Certain men,
especially appointed for the purpose, had to paint the knees of the warriors
with pulverized charcoal, and this was made to stick by scarifying the skin with
the jaw of a small species of garfish until it began to bleed slightly, after
which the coloring matter was rubbed on. This manipulation had to be repeated
every year.[xv]
“To
make these they kept a fire burning at the foot of a tree called cypress until
the fire burned through the trunk and the tree fell; next, they put fire on top
of the fallen tree at the length they wished to make their boat. When the tree
had burned down to the thickness they wanted for the depth of the boat, they put
out the fire with thick mud; then they scraped the tree with
big cockleshells as thick as a man's finger; afterward, they washed it with
water. Thus, they cleared it out as smooth as we could have made it with our
tools. These boats may be twenty-five feet long. The savages make them of
various lengths, some much smaller than others.”[xvi]
The
latania, commonly called palmetto.[xvii]
Buccaned
-- Derived from French boucaner, “to
smoke meat on a frame.” According to Read (Louisiana-French,
p. 83) boucan is a South American Tupi
word meaning a “wooden lattice frame for the smoking of meat.”
Mud
-- In hollowing out a log for a pirogue, the Indian worker used a layer of mud,
when necessary, to control the direction of the burning as well as the depth of
the trough.
[i]
Gatschet, Albert S. “The Shetimasha Indians of St. Mary’s Parish,
Southern Louisiana.” Anthrop. Society, vol. 2. Proceedings of the
Seventieth Annual Meeting of the Anthropological Society of Washington, May
1, 1883.
[ii]
Leitch, Barbara. A Concise Dictionary of Indian Tribes of North America.
Michigan: Reference Pub., 1979. Pp. 108-111.
[iii]
Duralde, Martin, MS, Bureau of American Ethnology, discovered about 1848.
[iv] Swanton,
Bull 43, 348-9.
[v]
Pénicaut, 1953, 18.
[vi]
Pénicaut, 1953, 18.
[vii]
Pénicaut, 1953, 19.
[viii]
Pénicaut, 1953, 19.
[ix]
Swanton, John R. Indians Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley &
Adjacent Coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Government Printing Office:
Washington, 1911. Pp. 342-346.
[x]
Gatschet, Albert S. “The Shetimasha Indians of St. Mary Parish, Southern
Louisiana.” Anthrop. Society, vol. 2. Proceedings of the Seventieth
Annual Meeting of the Anthropological Society of Washington, May 1, 1883.
[xi]
Swanton, 1911, 342-346.
[xii]
Swanton, 1911, 342-346.
[xiii]
Gatschet, 1883.
[xiv]
Swanton, 1911, 342-346.
[xv]
Gatschet, 1883.
[xvi]
Pénicaut. Fleur de Lys and Calumet. Trans. Richebourg Gaillard
McWilliams. Baton Rouge: LSU P, 1953. Pp. 8-9.
[xvii]
Pénicaut, 1953, 19.